Main Content

TCGA

Why are there fewer open access TCGA mutations in DR 32 (GENCODE Update Release)?

Submitted by Anonymous on

The primary reasons for the fewer open-access mutations are from two strategies that improve quality: 1) TCGA is now using a 2-caller ensemble, instead of a single caller; 2) Removal of variants outside of the target capture region, instead of a combined “target capture + GAF exonic region”. Additionally, TCGA was the original project in which GDC open-access variants were produced and used variant rescue steps that only applied to TCGA. To keep the TCGA variant-calling pipeline consistent across projects, GDC is no longer rescuing MC3 and TCGA validation variants.

Where can I find clinical data elements specific to my cancer research of interest?

Submitted by Anonymous on

The GDC supports the submission of clinical and biospecimen supplements. Supplemental files can be downloaded from the GDC by searching for the Data Type "Clinical Supplement" or "Biospecimen Supplement" from the facet search in the GDC Data Portal Repository. For TCGA data, the supplement data is provided in XML documents and tab delimited files (biotabs). These files, in varying degrees, provide information on marker status (e.g.

Why is the data maintained in cBioPortal, Broad Firehose, or the Seven Bridges Cancer Genomics Cloud different from the GDC data?

Submitted by Anonymous on

The GDC harmonizes data across projects. This includes aligning the genomic data to a common reference genome (HG38) and generating higher level data using GDC bioinformatics pipelines. Other repositories may process the data differently.

Why does the treatment data appear to be incomplete and what treatment data is available in the GDC?

Submitted by Anonymous on

Submitting treatment data is optional as not all projects are associated with treatment studies. For TCGA projects, for example, not all projects and cases have treatment data. For TCGA projects with treatment data, information is available in applicable clinical supplement files (i.e. clinical XML, biotabs). For other project associated with treatment studies in which the treatment data has been submitted to the GDC, treatment data is available for download in JSON and TSV format. These studies may also contain clinical supplement files.

Does the GDC provide access to follow-up (i.e. longitudinal) data?

Submitted by Anonymous on

The availability of follow-up data is specific to the project and associated study.

For the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) Clinical Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma to Personal Assessment of Genetic Profile (CoMMpass) study, longitudinal information was generated to track patients over the course of their disease. This data is available in the GDC by viewing the clinical follow-up data available for download on each case page in the GDC Data Portal or by querying the GDC API.

Why might variants found in TCGA-generated MAFs be missing from the GDC open access MAF files?

Submitted by Anonymous on

Some of the reasons particular mutations may have been removed include updates to third party databases, more conservative germline-masking rules by the GDC, and different mutation calling pipelines and versions. Despite these differences, the GDC recaptures over 97% of TCGA-validated variants in the controlled-access MAF files. The GDC suggests using controlled-access MAF files if important variants cannot be found in somatic MAF files.

Subscribe to TCGA